Winner: Fitbit Blaze Overall winner: Apple Watch You can get the Fitbit Blaze from the Fitbit website, as well as Amazon and other retailers - and you can do the same for the Apple Watch on the Apple website.īecause of how much cheaper it is, we’re awarding this one to the Fitbit. That’s a lot to pay, though for that price you get a much better watch.Īvailability is pretty much the same on these two devices. It comes at a cost - while the Fitbit Blaze starts at $200, the Apple Watch Series 2 starts at a whopping $370. There’s a trend in this comparison of the Apple Watch beating out the Fitbit Blaze, and for good reason. Winner: Apple Watch Price and availability In general, while the Fitbit is fine in the software department, Apple has put a lot of work into watchOS, and it has paid off. Of course, the Apple Watch won’t be there to help in that aspect - while the Apple Watch can track your workouts, it won’t offer pre-built workouts without the use of a third-party app. While the workouts that come with the watch are generally decent workouts for those on the go, those more serious about their workouts may need something more. ![]() Despite that, however, there are a few things missing from the Fitbit. You can get limited notifications from your phone, but you won’t be able to install apps on the device.įitness tracking is arguably the most important aspect of either of these watches, and both of them are pretty good at it. The Fitbit, however, is much more built for fitness tracking rather than anything else. Using the Apple Watch, you can control a number of your phone’s features straight from your wrist, as well as easily track a number of fitness metrics, and even make use of Siri. It’s worth mentioning it’s harder to charge the Fitbit than the Apple Watch - while you can just pop the Apple Watch on a wireless charging cradle, you actually have to remove the Blaze from the wristband and insert it into a cradle that closes when the device is charging.ĭespite that, we’re still awarding this one to the Fitbit Blaze for its much longer battery life.Ī big part of how the Apple Watch works is its integration with your iPhone, and Apple’s watchOS is arguably the most advanced and easy to use smartwatch operating system currently available. This is a category in which the Fitbit Blaze can regain a few points from the Apple Watch - while the Apple Watch will only last around 18 hours on a single charge, the Fitbit Charge will last a hefty 5 days - and it’ll get a full charge in between one and two hours of charging. A longer battery life can certainly be nice, especially for those who like to camp or go hiking, when charging may not necessarily be available. Traditionally speaking, watches have had batteries that allow them to last for months on end, but that’s not necessarily the case when it comes to smartwatches. Winner: Apple Watch Battery life and charging The Fitbit does offer Gorilla Glass 3, which helps with durability, but the Apple Watch uses various different strengthened glasses too. You won’t want to wear the Blaze while taking a swim - it may not last. The Fitbit, however, is only really splash-resistant. The device is waterproof up to 50 meters, meaning you can use it to track swimming. Last but not least is durability, and perhaps unsurprisingly the Apple Watch wins again. The display on the Fitbit, on the other hand, is an LCD display and sits in with a resolution of 240 x 180. On the Apple Watch, you’ll get an OLED display with a resolution of 272 x 340 or 390 x 312, along with Force Touch compatibility. ![]() The trend of the Apple Watch beating out the Fitbit Blaze continues when it comes to the display. Like the Apple Watch, the Fitbit Blaze offers a square design, but it’s also a little chunkier and a lot less sleek in how it looks. Some argue that it would be better if it was round - but even if that’s true, it’s still a far more stylish device than the Fitbit Blaze. It’s a sleek and stylish device that looks modern, yet classic. Love it or hate it, the Apple Watch has been paving the way in smartwatch design for the past few years. Still, better performance can help future-proof a smartwatch in the same way it can a smartphone. While the smartphone is largely considered to be the center of your digital life, the smartwatch is really only an extension of that - and needs to handle a lot less than the smartphone. Second-generation OLED Retina display with Force Touch (1,000 nits)Ĭomparing the specs of a wearable is often a little different than comparing a smartphone. Sapphire crystal glass (stainless steel and ceramic cases) Ion-X strengthened glass (aluminum cases)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |